Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Developer Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council changes timing for collection of development impact taxes to reduce financing costs for new housing
Summary
The County Council approved Expedited Bill 22‑24 to change when development impact taxes are collected so charges are assessed earlier in the process and are encumbered in financing, a measure sponsors say will lower development costs and support housing production.
The Montgomery County Council voted to approve Expedited Bill 22‑24, which alters the timing of collection for development impact taxes so that those charges are captured earlier in the project timeline and are thus included in financing calculations rather than added later as an interest‑bearing cost.
"If we want to build more housing that is affordable, we need to make it more affordable to build housing, full stop," said Councilmember Glass, the bill's lead, during the district council session. Glass and other supporters said moving the collection point earlier will reduce holding costs and interest charges that are currently rolled into project financing, and that the proposal is revenue neutral — the same taxes would be paid but at an earlier point in the process.
The Government Operations and Fiscal Policy (GO) committee recommended approval with amendments addressing administrative details such as how municipalities will process deferrals and who schedules the final inspection in relation to payment. The council adopted a committee amendment clarifying the sequence: transportation mitigation or school facilities payments are due "until the applicant schedules the final inspection of the building by the Department of Permitting Services," and the final inspection will not be scheduled until payment is received.
Councilmember Glass moved the amendment; the council approved it unanimously. Glass then moved the bill, which passed on a roll‑call vote. The clerk recorded recorded yes votes from a quorum of members.
Why it matters: Sponsors say earlier collection of impact fees reduces financing costs for developers — lowering the cost to build housing and potentially encouraging more production — while remaining revenue neutral for the county. GO committee members also said the change should be coordinated with an infrastructure funding work group the committee is assembling to examine project‑level infrastructure investments.
Next steps: The bill passed on final action; staff will implement the administrative changes and the GO committee will convene the proposed infrastructure funding work group to review related policy questions.
