West Central Regional Water District updates Clay County commissioners on master plan, funding and potential short-term county ask

The West Central Regional Water District presented a detailed update to the Clay County Board of Commissioners on its ongoing regional water feasibility, master planning and funding work, and asked counties to consider short-term “stop-gap” funding to avoid delays in engineering and court processes.

Why it matters: the district aims to secure a long-term safe water supply across parts of three counties and dozens of small cities and rural users. The project requires court-authorized district formation steps, detailed engineering and substantial capital funding. Delays in master planning or funding could push construction timelines and increase future costs.

Presentation and scope

Lucas Spieth, board chair of the West Central Regional Water District and utility superintendent for the city of Halstad, and Steven Slick of engineering firm AE2S briefed the board on the project’s history, geographic footprint and next steps. Spieth said the district’s feasibility work dates to 2019–2021 and that a pipeline to Climax funded through USDA was an early catalyst. Slick described a phased approach that divides the district into five study zones and focuses initial engineering and court survey work on “Zone 3” where early participation and need are concentrated.

Grants, local commitments and pending dollars

Slick told commissioners the project has secured about $3.5 million in federal EPA grants for master planning and phase‑1 design and is pursuing additional federal funds (a pending $750,000 application). He said regional cities have secured roughly $2.4 million through Minnesota Department of Economic Development for infrastructure related to potential hookups and that six cities in the district are applying for a combined $20 million for phase‑1 grants and loans. Slick also described outreach results — “450 plus rural testimonials” — summarizing common rural concerns as hard water, reliability, odor, staining and arsenic.

Short‑term funding and timing

Slick and Spieth said the work plan requires further funding to avoid delays while the EPA executes a grant agreement and the district finalizes legal and engineering steps. They described two stop‑gap scenarios discussed by the West Central board — $150,000 and $200,000 — to be apportioned proportionally among the three counties; Slick warned the full need to complete the second court proceeding could be closer to $400,000. He said those county advances are potentially reimbursable under EPA grants or repaid by district revenue once the district is established.

Commissioner reaction and next steps

Commissioners asked for more detail about where county funding would come from and emphasized that any county contribution would depend on commitments from Polk and Norman counties. Commissioner Baer, who attended recent city briefings, reported positive feedback from city officials and said Clay County staff will return to the board next week with funding-gap scenarios and options. The board did not take action on funding at the meeting and asked staff to return with a proposed funding plan and any intercounty agreements required for a county contribution.

Background and dependencies

Slick and Spieth detailed multiple dependencies: formal court approvals in the district-formation process, memoranda of inclusion from participating cities, coordination with the Minnesota Department of Health and DNR on water‑quality issues (notably arsenic in some rural wells), and potential coordination with cross-border projects such as the Red River Valley Water Supply Project. They emphasized that the court process requires extensive owner notices (an expected 15,000–16,000 notices for the three-county region) and that project timing could slip if engineering and legal work pause. Commissioners were told that delaying work could add another construction season to the schedule and increase costs.

What the district asked for

District leaders asked counties to consider short-term budgets to keep master planning and detailed surveys moving while grant paperwork is finalized. No county funds were committed at the meeting; commissioners agreed to discuss county funding options and apportionment formulas at future meetings.

— End —