Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Advisory Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Las Vegas recommending committee declines to recommend animal advisory committee; measure moves to full council
Summary
After extensive public comment urging creation of a city animal advisory committee, the recommending committee declined to recommend Bill 2024-41 but the ordinance will proceed to the City Council for consideration on Feb. 19, 2025.
Get email alerts on the Animal Advisory Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LAS VEGAS — The City of Las Vegas recommending committee on Feb. 3 debated Bill 2024-41, an ordinance proposed by Councilwoman Victoria Seaman to add chapter 2.67 to Title 2 of the Las Vegas Municipal Code to establish a city animal advisory committee. The committee did not recommend the bill; it will be considered by the City Council at its Feb. 19, 2025 meeting.
Supporters of the advisory committee filled the public-comment period, asking the committee to create a standing body to advise council members and coordinate local responses to what they described as an ongoing animal-welfare crisis. "I'm here to support ... the creation of the animal advisory board," said Bryce Henderson, president of No Kale Las Vegas, during public comment. Patricia Reed of Hearts Alive Village said the committee would give "animals a voice." Gina Grayson of Nevada Voters for Animals said the panel could help update and harmonize ordinances across jurisdictions.
Proponents described multiple problems they said the committee could address: illegal breeders, insufficient low-cost spay-and-neuter services, divergent local ordinances, and high shelter intake and euthanasia rates. "Instead of going after the symptoms of the problem, let's go after the source of the problem," said Dave Schweiger of Bunnies Matter, urging enforcement against illegal breeding and expanded low-cost sterilization. Tracy Paz, a volunteer, told the committee that "as of this morning ... there are 43 animals scheduled to die today at 3 PM," citing the shelter's list and urging immediate action.
Some speakers raised process and membership questions. Brandy Glasgow, a professional dog groomer, urged that the advisory committee include representatives of the "professional animal care community"—veterinarians, groomers, and day-care operators—because many ordinances affect businesses as well as animals. Kathleen Witherspoon of Community Cat Angels noted widespread public confusion about the committee's role and emphasized it would advise the City Council, not the contract shelter.
Councilwoman Victoria Seaman framed the panel as a direct line of community input to council members. "Animals are living, breathing entities that are suffering in the city of Las Vegas," Seaman said, and she urged colleagues to create a formal venue for stakeholders to present solutions, from PR campaigns to code updates. Committee members debated whether a new advisory body would improve council access to on-the-ground information or create an extra layer between the public and elected officials. The committee chair said past versions of a city animal panel (a 1990s-era committee that reviewed dangerous-animal cases) differed in scope and were repealed in 2011 when referrals slowed.
The recommending committee heard a motion to approve Bill 2024-41 from Councilwoman Victoria Seaman and a subsequent motion to deny the committee's recommendation. Committee members did not reach a recommending vote in favor of the bill; clerks confirmed that, despite the committee's action, the bill will advance to the City Council and will be eligible for adoption at the council meeting on Feb. 19, 2025. Separately, the committee approved the Jan. 13, 2025 meeting minutes during the same session.
Supporters in the room said the advisory committee could centralize outreach and reduce repetitive testimony at multiple meetings, while many urged immediate enforcement changes—targeting illegal breeders and expanding low-cost spay/neuter programs—to reduce shelter intake. Speakers repeatedly asked the council to make clear the committee's scope and membership (advocates, veterinarians, groomers, shelter representatives and business owners), and to schedule meetings at times accessible to working people.
The item will return for a full council vote on Feb. 19, 2025. Until then, advocates said they will continue outreach to council members. "We will be reaching out to the other council members," Bryce Henderson said, "and we will all be back here in bigger numbers."

