Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Rights Adjudication topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee approves revised water-rights adjudication rules (Docket 370-301-2401)
Summary
The Senate Resources & Environment Committee voted to accept Idaho Department of Water Resources’ revised adjudication rules (docket 370-301-2401), approving changes intended to streamline filing requirements, clarify fees and definitions, and reduce regulatory wording.
The Senate Resources & Environment Committee voted to accept the Idaho Department of Water Resources’ revised adjudication rules, docket 370-301-2401, advancing the department’s 0‑based review of administrative rules.
The change package, submitted as part of the department’s 2024 rule review, rewrites definitions and filing requirements for notice-of-claim procedures, updates fee-calculation criteria and refund rules, and restructures minimum claim-filing requirements to improve readability and consistency.
“The adjudication rules set the minimum requirements for completing a notice of claim to a water right established under state law and establishes clear criteria for calculating claim filing fees, refunding fees, and rejecting incomplete claims,” said Eric Bowe, Water Compliance Bureau Chief and Rules Regulation Officer for the Idaho Department of Water Resources.
The department presented the docket as part of its yearlong 0‑base review and said the rulemaking reduced the chapter’s word count by roughly 831 words (about a 17 percent reduction) and decreased the restrictive word count by 79 words (about 65 percent). The department reported two public negotiated meetings, minimal public attendance, one oral comment and 10 written comments that were considered during the revision process. Among substantive edits were removal of unnecessary definitions, updates to clarify surface-water source descriptions and alignment of location-description language with the department’s water appropriation rules and USGS township/range/section descriptions.
Committee discussion focused on technical drafting and mapping conventions. Vice Chair Senator Phil Hart asked whether the revised location descriptions tie to US Geological Survey (USGS) township/range/section surveying nomenclature; Bowe replied that the department adjusted the descriptions to be consistent with the water appropriation rules and PLS (public land survey) descriptions. Craig Saxton, the department’s water allocations bureau chief and subject-matter expert, explained that an aquaculture fee referenced in the definitions was moved into the rule body because it was only used once and better placed with related provisions.
Senator Harris moved to accept the docket; Senator Taylor seconded the motion. The committee approved the docket by voice vote.
The approved rule chapter addresses terminology (Rule 10), fee payment and rejection provisions (Rule 25), flat and variable fee calculation (Rules 30 and 35), amendment and late-fee rules (Rules 45 and 50), refund criteria (Rule 55), claim requirements (Rule 60) and rejection/refiling procedures (Rule 65). The department identified specific edits such as expanded definitions of “public entity” and “public purpose” to clarify fees for public claims and clarified review criteria for claims based on enlargement or expansions.
The committee did not request additional follow-up; the department said it may rely on subject-matter experts for subsequent questions.
Votes at a glance: Docket 370-301-2401 — Motion to accept by Senator Harris; second by Senator Taylor; approved by voice vote (individual member roll-call not specified).
