Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Experts debate infiltration feasibility for Meadowview; county review finds conservative pond design
Summary
Geotechnical and civil engineers differed over whether Meadowview’s soils support infiltration system credits. Applicant civil engineer said limited infiltration is being implemented; the geotechnical consultant and an independent expert urged further field testing during final engineering before reducing pond sizing.
At a Jan. 17 Kitsap County consolidated hearing on the Meadowview preliminary plat SEPA appeal, project geotechnical and civil engineers and outside experts clashed over whether the site can rely on infiltration systems rather than large ponds to meet county stormwater rules.
Miss Decker, a geotechnical engineer for Terra Associates, testified that the Meadowview site contains three broad soil zones and that infiltration is feasible in the northern, outwash-mapped portion of the property but not across the entire site. She said the firm’s preliminary long-term design infiltration rate for candidate northern areas is 1 inch per hour, and that deeper testing and final-engineering site grading will be required to confirm any infiltrative systems.
Why this matters: Kitsap County’s stormwater manual guides a multi-step feasibility check that first looks for measured infiltration rates, then derives a design rate. County guidance and project engineers said Meadowview’s final stormwater design must be conservative at preliminary plat because some portions of the site have low-permeability formations, steep slopes and many planned walls and cuts that could limit…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
