Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Private Roads topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cowlitz County planners seek board support to loosen private‑road rules for small short plats
Summary
Building and Planning presented a proposal to remove the county engineer’s sign‑off on short plats up to four lots, raise the private‑road trigger from three to five lots, and allow lower surface widths to reduce costs for small developers.
Tracy Jackson, director of Building and Planning, told the Board of County Commissioners on Feb. 3 that staff and the Building and Planning Advisory Committee (BPAC) are asking for board support to change how the county handles short plats and private roads for small subdivisions.
Jackson said BPAC has held nine meetings and produced 16 draft versions of proposed changes intended to reduce development costs and timelines for homeowners and small developers. The core proposal would remove the county engineer’s required sign‑off on short plats of up to four lots, raise the threshold that triggers private‑road standards from the third lot to the fifth lot, and allow narrower surface widths — potentially lowering minimum surface width from 20 feet toward 14 feet for certain short plats while retaining safe standards for emergency access.
Jackson said the change would not remove county oversight but would move some design review and private‑road permitting in‑house under a revised short‑subdivision ordinance and an internal policy, making the process more like an excavation/grading permit and reducing out‑of‑pocket costs for applicants. She said staff would still require fire‑safety access and other minimums and that larger developments (five lots or more) would continue to meet county road standards and require county engineer review.
Commissioners who spoke voiced support for the direction and asked staff to proceed with SEPA review, a two‑week comment period, Planning Commission review and a future public hearing before the board. Jackson said the change will include repealing and replacing certain short‑subdivision code sections and will circulate for public comment through the normal land‑use review process.
No ordinance changes were adopted at the Feb. 3 meeting; staff sought the board’s endorsement to advance the proposal through environmental review and the Planning Commission.
