Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Building and Planning seeks board support to ease private‑road standards for small short plats
Summary
Building and Planning staff proposed removing the county engineer from approval of short plats of four lots or fewer, raising the private‑road trigger from three to five lots, and moving certain reviews in‑house to reduce costs and timelines for small developers; staff will run a SEPA review and take the proposal to the planning commission.
Tracy Jackson, director of Cowlitz County Building and Planning, asked the Board of Commissioners on Feb. 3 to support a package of changes intended to lower development costs and shorten permitting timelines for small private short plats.
Jackson said staff and the Building and Planning Advisory Committee (BPAC) had extensively revised private‑road and short‑plat procedures, with "9 BPAC meetings" and multiple draft revisions. Staff proposed raising the threshold that triggers the county engineer's private‑road standard: "The third lot of any short plat or any driveway triggers a private road standard. We're trying to raise that to the fifth lot so then it does not hit private roads," Jackson said.
Why this matters: The county engineer's sign-off and higher private‑road standards can add substantial out‑of‑pocket costs for small landowners and homebuilders. Jackson gave the example of homeowners quoted a six‑figure bill to meet the engineer's private‑road requirements and said the proposal is intended to reduce those costs for small, commonly owner‑built projects.
Details of the proposal include removing the county engineer’s required signature from certain short plat approvals and handling reviews internally under an updated short‑plat ordinance and a new in‑house policy. Jackson said the change would apply to small developments (up to four lots) and that larger developments (five lots or more) would continue to meet county road standards and go to the county engineer.
Commissioners asked about timing and whether changes would align with state permitting timeline laws. Jackson said the revision should shorten review times because it keeps the review process in‑house and continues to meet a current 30‑day preliminary short‑plat timeline. Staff said the next steps are a SEPA review with a two‑week comment period, then planning‑commission review and, ultimately, a public hearing before the board.
What happens next: Jackson asked the board for its support to proceed; staff will begin SEPA review, circulate drafts to the public, and schedule the matter for planning commission consideration and a future public hearing. No code amendments were adopted at the Feb. 3 meeting.
Ending: Commissioners signaled general support and asked staff to proceed with the SEPA and planning‑commission stages; staff emphasized that updates are intended to reduce costs and timelines for small landowners while preserving standards for larger developments.
