Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Structure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board asks staff to return with hybrid CEO/CAO reporting proposal after HR study

2213575 · January 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a human-resources study showed Humboldt County is an outlier in having appointed department heads report directly to the board, supervisors asked staff to return within three months with alternative models (including a hybrid CEO/CAO option) for potential changes to the reporting structure.

The board reviewed a human-resources study on the county's appointed department-head reporting structure and directed staff to prepare more detailed alternatives, including a hybrid CEO/CAO model. HR staff said Humboldt is one of the few Northern California counties in which appointed department heads report collectively to the full board rather than through a single county administrative or executive officer.

HR analyst Beth Rogers presented the findings, which relied on interviews with board members, a partial department-head survey and a regional comparison of 15 counties. Rogers told supervisors that participation in the survey was incomplete (11 of 20 department heads responded) and that the county's outlier status suggested the board should evaluate options carefully. CAO Alicia Hayes said the change would be significant and recommended a phased approach if the board wished to proceed.

Board members voiced differing views: some said direct board access to department heads is valuable for constituent services; others said a CEO or hybrid model could improve coordination, especially for budgeting and personnel issues. Supervisor Bone said he was reluctant to shift authority while a current CAO remains in place; Supervisor Wilson argued the choice should be about structure, not individuals.

The board voted unanimously to direct staff to return within three months with proposed alternatives and recommended language for codifying a hybrid model (including examples from other counties), and to prioritize departments for a potential transition if the board chooses to pilot a new reporting arrangement.

Staff said proposed next steps could include additional analysis, an outside review, model ordinances from peer counties and a menu of pilot options for departments.