Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mcas Competency Determination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Easton schools scramble to set MCAS competency rules for 2025 class after state leaves decision to districts
Summary
Easton Public Schools staff told the School Committee they are preparing an expedited, separate competency-determination process for the Class of 2025 and planning a policy review afterward, while remaining mindful of the law’s retroactive exposure for prior graduates.
Superintendent Doctor Cabral told the Easton School Committee on Jan. 9 that the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has left decisions about MCAS competency determinations to local districts and that Easton must decide how to proceed quickly for the Class of 2025.
The committee was told the state has reclassified MCAS as a “competency determination” and will no longer set a single statewide competency policy. "They are now charging districts on their own to determine what the competency determination is going to be," Doctor Cabral said. That change created an urgent timing problem for seniors who have months, not years, left before graduation.
Why it matters: competency determination differs from graduation requirements and can be applied retroactively. Doctor Cabral said Easton must both help current seniors through a February retake and decide a fair, documented process for any retroactive claims going back up to 21 years. "It could be the same determination, but we really want to focus on 2025 first," she said.
District steps and timeline - School leaders (Principal Kavanaugh and two assistant principals), the director of guidance, and Director Davidson met with district leadership to draft a short-term proposal for the class of 2025 and a longer-term policy option for future years. Doctor Cabral said the draft process will go first to the policy subcommittee for vetting and then to the full committee. - The district will try to expedite deliberations but cautioned that a formal policy requires two mandatory readings by the committee; staff said they may request workshop sessions to finalize details quickly. - The school team also met with area superintendents; Doctor Cabral reported no regional consensus and that districts differ widely in numbers and circumstances — some districts face dozens or hundreds of affected students if retroactivity is applied.
Uncertainty and next steps - Staff confirmed a February retake of MCAS is scheduled; Doctor Cabral said results typically arrive in May and that a retake could resolve the issue for some or all affected seniors. "There is a retake in February, so the students will be taking it. It's possible one or all of them could pass it, and it's a nonissue," she said. "However, it is also possible that they don't pass it." - Because the change can be applied retroactively, staff must also define a fair process for adults who may request review of competency determination for past years.
Committee response and follow-up - Committee members asked clarifying questions about timing and the scale of impact; Doctor Cabral said staff will both pursue an immediate, 2025-specific process and continue work on a separate, longer-term competency-determination policy rather than reopening the district’s graduation-requirements policy.
The committee did not take a formal vote on policy text at the meeting. Staff committed to a policy-subcommittee review and a follow-up presentation to the full committee as soon as a workable draft is available.
