Committee advances RS 31903 on 'self-directed learner' funding; some senators call it a voucher

The Senate Education Committee voted to advance RS 31903, a legislative request (print hearing) concerning the "self-directed learner" model that would allow funds designated for a student to flow to parents under an agreement with the local school district.

Senator Dave Lent, who identified himself as representing District 33 (Idaho Falls), explained the concept as he understood it: “it allows simply for a parent to work with their local school district and basically create an individual education plan with that student in conjunction with the district, the student, and the parents to further that student's education.” Lent said the change at lines beginning on page 2 would permit funds designated for that student to “also flow to the parents in conjunction with an agreement with that district.”

Senator Ward Engelking said he supported individualized learning plans in principle but opposed the change in RS 31903, arguing it resembles a voucher program. He said, “This sounds like a voucher program to me. It's taking state public funds and paying parents to teach their children at home. And I have a real problem with it.” Senator Linn suggested Senator Thain, the bill's original proponent, should appear at a full hearing to answer questions. Senator Nichols said advancing the request would allow the committee to begin “frank conversations” about education policy.

Committee action and process: Committee members described the item as a print hearing, meaning the committee would not go into detailed mechanics at this session. A motion to move RS 31903 forward was seconded by Senator Carlson and approved by voice vote after brief remarks; one senator registered opposition. The transcript shows at least one recorded “nay” and Senator Ward Engelking had earlier said he would vote no on the print hearing. The committee did not record a roll-call tally in the transcript.

Why it matters: RS 31903 would change how specified student-designated funds may be used and who can receive them. Proponents described the change as a way to give parents and districts flexibility to support students who need accelerated or specialized services; opponents warned it could divert public funds in a manner similar to vouchers.

Ending: Committee members agreed to move RS 31903 forward; a fuller hearing with the bill's sponsor or author was suggested for future consideration.