Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Pensions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Competing pension proposals prefiled: Kiehl offers choice model, Giessel advances defined-benefit plan
Summary
Sen. Jesse Kiehl filed a bill to let state workers choose between a 401(k)-style plan and a pension; Sen. Kathy Giessel filed a bill resembling last session’s defined-benefit pension revival. Both proposals face cost and legislative hurdles.
Two differing pension proposals were among prefiled bills discussed before Gov. Dunleavy’s speech: one from Sen. Jesse Kiehl and another from Sen. Kathy Giessel.
Sen. Jesse Kiehl of Juneau filed a proposal that would allow public employees to choose between a defined-contribution (401(k)-style) plan and a defined-benefit pension system. Kiehl’s approach was described on-air as a means to give workers choice in retirement structure.
Sen. Kathy Giessel, identified in coverage as an Anchorage Republican, filed a bill that closely resembles a defined-benefit pension revival that passed the Senate in a prior year but stalled in the House because of cost concerns. Commentators noted pension revival had support in parts of the Legislature but failed previously over affordability.
Why it matters: Changes to retirement plans for state employees affect long-term liabilities for the state and retirement security for public workers. Debate commonly turns on actuarial costs, contribution rates and the state’s willingness to assume pension liabilities versus shifting costs to individual workers.
The broadcast did not provide bill numbers or full fiscal notes. Reporters expected pension legislation to be a priority for the new bipartisan legislative majorities but cautioned that prior cost concerns could limit enactment this session.
