Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthcare Costs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health & Welfare committee outlines bill addressing health‑care costs, electronic records and hospital global budgets
Summary
Members of the Health & Welfare committee discussed a three-part bill covering electronic medical records, the state health plan and multi‑year hospital global budgets, identified consultants and funding, and scheduled further meetings with the House Health Care panel.
Members of the Health & Welfare committee discussed next steps for a three-part legislative bill to address rising health‑care costs, electronic medical records (EMR) and hospital budgeting at a meeting held online ahead of next week’s sessions.
The proposal, described by Speaker 1, a committee member, would combine (1) technical fixes for claims and clinical data interoperability (EMR), (2) planning adjustments to the state health plan, and (3) a multi‑year pilot to test global hospital budgets for the state’s five largest hospitals. "I've asked Jen to draft something up that looks at a 3 year period for developing a global budget, hospital global budgets, perhaps for our 5 biggest hospitals," Speaker 1 said.
Why it matters: Vermont currently ranks among the highest per capita for hospital costs, the committee noted, and members said they want to use the bill to limit short‑term budget pressures while protecting essential services. "If we do some of the things we project we can do in our in a committee bill or in a bill of any type, we could realize a $100,000,000 reduction in cost savings. Let's just call it savings the 1st year," Speaker 1 said, while also saying they were skeptical of some projections.
Discussion points included technical interoperability of EMRs, how revisions to the state health plan would interact with payment reforms, and detailed language needed for multi‑year hospital budgets. Speaker 1 said the first two sections of the bill are more planning and technical, while the third—global budgets—will be "quite technical and involved in terms of the language that we'll put into the bill." The committee plans to bring a template of draft language to members for review.
Members also discussed recent and planned spending on engagement and consulting. One committee member, labeled here as Speaker 2, asked whether the Green Mountain Care Board has reported on its expenditures; Speaker 1 replied the House had done a deep dive and that the board would appear before the committee. The transcript records committee discussion that $900,000 and $4,100,000 were allocated to Agency of Human Services (AHS) for engagement processes; Speaker 2 asked for clarity about whether Oliver Wyman or a rural health consultant was engaged for that work. Speaker 1 said those questions will be pursued at next week’s hearings.
Next steps: the committee scheduled additional meetings next week: Act 167 is on Tuesday’s agenda and the committee will meet with the House Health Care panel on Wednesday to hear outside experts and the Green Mountain Care Board. Speaker 1 said staff will work "to get something out of the committee before crossover" and that, if necessary, items may need to "travel down the hallway very quickly." No formal motions or votes were recorded in the transcript provided.
The committee emphasized safeguards to avoid losing essential services while pursuing cost and payment reforms; members repeatedly framed the work as preparatory and conditional on further analysis, testimony and negotiation with insurers, hospitals and state agencies.
