Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infill Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board approves 88 Maple Street infill project; adds turnaround and snow-clearing conditions
Summary
The Planning Board granted site plan and conditional-use approval for an infill dwelling addition at 88 Maple Street, approving findings and adding conditions requiring a posted turnaround/no-parking sign and clearing of marked parking and drive areas within 24 hours after storms.
The Saco Planning Board voted 4–0 to approve the site plan and conditional-use application for 88 Maple Street, a proposal to add an additional dwelling unit in a medium-density residential district. The board adopted findings of fact, amended a condition to require a posted “turnaround only — no parking” sign with the area kept clear of snow and objects, and added a condition requiring marked parking and driveway areas be cleared of snow within 24 hours after storms.
Why it matters: The project is an infill residential conversion intended to add a unit while addressing circulation and safety concerns. City staff and peer reviewers suggested the no-parking turnaround and a snow-clearing requirement to preserve access for emergency responders and to reduce conflicts in a constrained site.
Supporting details: Planning staff said code enforcement, public works and a traffic peer reviewer had evaluated a revised parking plan; the traffic peer reviewer recommended the no-parking sign in the turnaround adjacent to an existing three-bay garage. Board member Jeff Brochu proposed wording to make the municipal-use unit language clear on a different project earlier in the meeting; for 88 Maple he proposed an amendment requiring the turnaround sign and that the area be kept clear of snow, vehicles and objects. Jeff later moved to add condition 13 requiring all marked parking and driveway areas be cleared of snowfall within 24 hours to maintain emergency access; the board approved the amended conditions and later granted site-plan conditional-use approval.
Board action and votes: Motions included adoption of the findings of fact, amendment and adoption of conditions, and final approval of the site-plan and conditional-use application. All motions passed by recorded votes of 4–0 (Matt DiCiani — yes; Jim Moeller — yes; Jeff Brochu — yes; Joyce Larry Clark — yes).
What’s next: The applicant will comply with the amended conditions of approval (dumpster screening, posted signage and snow-clearing practices) before construction and occupancy; staff will include the new conditions in the project file and monitor compliance.
Ending: The Planning Board approved the application and recorded specific conditions intended to protect circulation and emergency access on a tight infill site.
