Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Courthouse Siting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Newport courthouse project stalls on land purchase and parking concerns; $1 million sought for FY27 design work
Summary
Officials told the committee the Newport courthouse site is constrained, parking and accessibility are unresolved, and $1 million is being requested in FY27 to start design if a site can be found.
Committee members pressed Buildings and General Services on Jan. 31 about whether to continue pursuing renovation of the historic Newport courthouse or look for alternative sites.
Joe Ajah of Buildings and General Services reviewed site constraints at the downtown Newport building, noting limited parking, narrow alleys and an existing fuel-oil tank near an access ramp. Ajah said the courthouse footprint is tight — “about 8 parking spaces between the courthouse and the phone company building” — and that accessibility problems include an elevator shaft too small for a standard wheelchair and upper floors limited by wood-frame construction and occupancy limits under current codes.
Greg Mosley, chief of finance and administration for the Vermont Judiciary, told the committee the judiciary has discussed alternatives, including sites outside downtown Newport. Mosley said accessibility and transit access were key concerns the court raised; the court did not dismiss moving out of downtown if a suitable, accessible site could be found. Mosley also said counties generally do not charge the judiciary rent for county-owned courthouses.
Committee members asked whether substantial renovations would be justified given the parking and code limitations. Ajah said BGS has not yet completed a detailed renovation viability analysis for the Newport building after many years of study and that the project team had been seeking land downtown without success. He said BGS may issue another request for proposals (RFP) that would allow evaluation of properties beyond the downtown area if the committee approves language to widen the search.
BGS requested $1 million in FY27 to begin design and engage a construction manager if a site is identified. Ajah and committee members emphasized the long history of the item, saying the issue has been under discussion for five to six years; members urged BGS to return with a clear site strategy and a renovation feasibility analysis before additional large appropriations are made.
The committee did not vote on the FY27 request during the hearing and asked BGS to supply the original RFP language and additional analysis on parking, accessibility and alternatives to a downtown site.
