Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends against statewide bonus bill for law enforcement amid fiscal concerns
Summary
House Bill 1193, proposing a recurring bonus for certain law enforcement officers, drew debate about cost and precedent; the committee voted a do‑not‑pass recommendation citing state budget constraints and potential precedents for other groups.
The House Political Subdivisions Committee voted to recommend a do‑not‑pass on House Bill 1193, which would have authorized recurring bonuses for specified law enforcement personnel.
Committee members discussed the bill’s intent — recruitment and retention for law enforcement — and whether the proposed recurring bonuses would create budgetary and precedent challenges for the state. Representative Bosley characterized the proposal as difficult to classify as a recruitment and retention tool because many current officers eligible under the proposal already have multiple years of service.
Members noted the bill’s fiscal exposure. Representative Clamine cited a separate figure that, if applied to 2,816 correctional licensed officers at $6,000 each, would exceed the appropriation in the bill by a large margin. Committee members raised concerns about creating a state‑level compensation program that could prompt other occupational groups to seek similar treatment.
Representative Bosley moved a do‑not‑pass recommendation; the motion was seconded and the committee adopted the do‑not‑pass on a roll call of 9 yeas, 3 nays, 1 absent, not voting. Representative Vosley agreed to carry the committee’s recommendation to the floor.
