Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County approves Albert residence with limits on grading, imposes wildfire and lighting conditions

2175419 · January 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Boulder County commissioners on Jan. 7 conditionally approved an application by the Albert Living Trust to build a 4,890-square-foot residence with a 400-square-foot carport at 4259 Prado Drive, subject to limits on grading and other conditions intended to protect riparian habitat, reduce wildfire risk and limit light impacts on nearby open space.

Boulder County commissioners on Jan. 7 conditionally approved an application by the Albert Living Trust to build a 4,890-square-foot residence with a 400-square-foot carport at 4259 Prado Drive, subject to limits on grading and other conditions intended to protect riparian habitat, reduce wildfire risk and limit light impacts on nearby open space.

The approval follows a contested public hearing in which county planning staff recommended restrictions after identifying substantial proposed earthwork — initially about 1,813 cubic yards — and potential impacts to riparian areas, floodplain edges and wildlife habitat. Planning staff recommended restricting development to previously disturbed areas south of a platted easement and adding conditions addressing wildfire mitigation, drainage, invasive weeds and nighttime lighting.

Wesley Jeffries, community planning and permitting staff, told the board the site is “encumbered by the floodway, the 100‑year floodplain, and the 500‑year floodplain,” and that staff was “recommending a condition of approval restricting development to previously disturbed areas specifically south of the platted easement.” Jeffries also said the site ranks high for biodiversity and contains riparian and wetland mapping layers that informed the staff recommendation. Planning staff flagged concerns about the volume of grading and the project’s effect on historic drainage patterns and…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans