Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ctahr Staffing And Stations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee defers CTAHR staffing and research-station funding questions after lengthy debate

2174885 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers deferred action on Senate Bill 663, which would add positions and expand CTAHR programming, after extended questioning about vacant position counts, university budgeting, and station upkeep.

The joint committee deferred Senate Bill 663 after extended questioning about the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources' staffing, vacant positions and capital priorities. The chair said the committee will take up the bill at a later meeting and requested detailed position and vacancy accounting from the university.

CTAHR witnesses, led by the college dean, described a multi-pronged request in SB663 that would add eight positions to address a long-term decline in research technicians and expand community-engaged station work. The dean told senators CTAHR is down by 34 technical positions since 2005 and requested eight new positions and four community coordinator positions (one per county) to deepen engagement and workforce development.

Members pressed the dean on the accuracy and source of the college's vacancy listings, federal versus state-funded position counts, and whether positions identified as vacant are budgeted and available. Senator Hashimoto and other members questioned large vacancy tables that list many unfilled positions with no money attached; the dean said prior federal-funded positions, salary savings and university accounting practices had produced misleading counts and pledged to provide an updated, reconciled position inventory to the committee.

Committee members repeatedly raised process concerns about how the university pools and reallocates position funding. Several senators asked that the provost and university budget office provide clarity on "n-count" and APT (appointed personnel) positions, salary-savings practices, and how positions are prioritized in the Board of Regents process.

Deputy and associate extension leaders described the roles the requested positions would fill, including extension agents focused on farm-to-school work, student services staff for CTAHR undergraduates, and technical support. Jeremy Elliott Engel, associate dean for Cooperative Extension, explained that extension faculty roles combine geographic assignment and technical focus and distinguished k–12 farm-to-school agents from campus student services staff.

The dean also described new initiatives tied to the request: a summer research program for high school and community-college students, a planned three-year undergraduate degree delivered in partnership with community colleges emphasizing hands-on station-based learning, and plans to restart soil and swab testing capacity using internal funds and requested staff. The committee recessed further action and set a follow-up deadline for the university to deliver reconciled vacancy counts before the February 6 meeting.

The measure was deferred; no committee motion to pass or fail was recorded at this hearing.