Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Public Records topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter advises Hubbardston board on open‑meeting rules, public records and conduct
Summary
During the Jan. 28 Board of Health meeting, Mike Hugo reviewed open‑meeting law traps — serial communications, text/email discoverability, public‑comment limits as defined by SJC case law, recording rights, and executive‑session exceptions — and urged local boards to adopt procedures and training.
Mike Hugo told the Town of Hubbardston Board of Health that open‑meeting law and public‑records obligations pose frequent compliance risks for local boards and that routine practices — including texting during meetings and replying‑all by email — can create discoverable records that lead to complaints.
Hugo recommended clear practices: post notices and agendas for any joint meetings with other town boards; avoid serial communications (emails, texts) among a quorum; do not use an internal social‑media thread as a forum for deliberation; and beware of reply‑all. He cautioned that text messages and phone recordings shown during meetings generally become part of the public record.
On public comment, Hugo said the state Supreme Judicial Court has limited a municipality’s ability to silence speakers once a public‑comment period is opened. He said boards may set time limits (for example, two minutes per speaker) but cannot broadly shut down speech unless there is an imminent threat of bodily harm. He warned that civility rules must be narrowly tailored and supported by counsel.
Hugo also reviewed executive‑session exceptions relevant to boards of health and flagged hoarding enforcement as an area that implicates mental‑health privacy; he said counsel and the Attorney General’s office have discussed whether that exception can apply to hoarding hearings in order to protect an individual’s medical privacy.
On recording, Hugo said members of the public may record meetings and boards cannot prohibit recording so long as the recording is not disruptive. He also cautioned that administrative search warrants and other enforcement tools exist for inspection refusals in restaurants.
Hugo urged that the board receive regular training, adopt simple written rules about electronic communications and public‑comment procedures, and coordinate with town counsel when hearings or executive sessions raise privacy or public‑safety issues. No procedural changes were adopted at the session.
