Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances SB 58 after substitute narrows mobile‑crane rules
Summary
The Senate Business and Labor Standing Committee on Jan. 30 favorably recommended first substitute to SB 58, which narrows mobile‑crane regulation to tilt‑up construction and exempts state buildings; committee recorded a 4‑0 recommendation and the substitute carried a zero fiscal note.
Get email alerts on the Construction Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Senate Business and Labor Standing Committee on Jan. 30 voted to favorably recommend the first substitute to Senate Bill 58, titled “Mobile Crane Amendments,” by a 4‑0 tally.
The substitute narrows the bill’s scope so its mobile‑crane requirements apply specifically to tilt‑up construction projects, and it excludes state buildings. Sponsor Senator Musselman said those changes brought the fiscal note to zero and addressed unintended effects on UDOT and other uses of cranes.
The change matters because modern tilt‑up buildings use larger concrete panels and require heavier cranes than a decade ago, creating different soil‑bearing and stability concerns than earlier, smaller projects. “The size of cranes that are needed to lift these into place are really large,” Musselman said, describing why the substitute focuses on tilt‑ups.
Joey Gilbert, president and CEO of the Associated General Contractors of Utah, told the committee that crane transport and operation are managed through Utah Department of Transportation permitting when cranes travel on public highways. “In order to move a crane on a highway, they would have to obtain a permit from UDOT,” Gilbert said. He added crane companies typically disassemble cranes to meet permit weight limits for transport.
The substitute also adds a liability provision the bill describes as a presumption of owner negligence if a mobile crane is operated on a project where the owner failed to meet specific geotechnical requirements; Gilbert explained the draft requires owners to ensure soil and site preparations when crane pressure exceeds a stated threshold (listed in the bill as 35,100 PSF). The committee did not alter that language during the hearing.
Representatives of the Utah Department of Transportation and the Utah Mechanical Contractors Association testified in support of the substitute and thanked the sponsor for working with stakeholders. Lee Felder, legislative director for UDOT, said the agency submitted a zero fiscal note after the changes. Robert Bergman of the Utah Mechanical Contractors Association said the substitute “is perfect for our organization” and expressed support.
Committee members had no further questions after staff and industry witnesses explained the operational and permitting context. The committee recorded a 4‑0 favorable recommendation for the first substitute to SB 58.
The committee did not state subsequent calendar scheduling or further committee referral during the hearing.
