Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Outdoor Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adds federal wildlife refuge lands to list that can stay open during shutdowns
Summary
House Bill 200 passed the Utah House to allow the Division of Outdoor Recreation to prioritize certain U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands to remain open during a federal government shutdown and reassign the division’s reporting committee.
Get email alerts on the Outdoor Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on Jan. 30 passed House Bill 200, which allows the Division of Outdoor Recreation to add lands managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to the list of federal lands the state can prioritize to keep open during a federal government shutdown.
Why it matters: Sponsors said the change would protect visitor access and local gateway economies if federal closures occur, and it updates committee reporting requirements after an internal reorganization of the division.
Sponsor presentation and exchange: Representative Cutler, the bill sponsor, said the change would enable the division to "add met lands managed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service to those that they can prioritize to keep open in the event of a government shutdown." In floor exchange, Representative Ivory asked whether the state was reimbursed for expenses when the legislature previously appropriated money to keep national parks and monuments open during a federal shutdown. Cutler replied that Utah had not always been fully reimbursed and pointed to a 2014 report on the 2013 shutdown showing significant local spending; he framed the action as protecting state‑managed priorities and local economies.
Debate and vote: Discussion on the floor was limited after that exchange; Representative Cutler waived summation. Voting closed with House Bill 200 receiving 73 yea votes and 0 nay votes. The bill will be sent to the Senate for consideration.
Limitations and clarifications: The transcript records the sponsor’s statement that the state previously covered costs during shutdowns and that some federal reimbursements were not complete; the floor exchange did not produce a specific reimbursement schedule or guarantee of reimbursement going forward. The bill text and implementation plan (e.g., which FWS lands would be prioritized or how costs would be covered) were not read on the floor and are therefore "not specified" in the transcript.
