Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Committee Procedure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Judiciary Committee revotes on HB 98 and HB 164 to correct procedural notice; both advance

2170862 · January 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Judiciary Committee reopened votes on House Bill 98 and House Bill 164 after the clerk flagged a potential notice error. Both measures were approved in new votes and will move on in the process.

Chairman Lynn reopened an executive session of the House Judiciary Committee to correct a procedural irregularity and asked the committee to revote on two bills previously decided.

The committee reopened votes after Paul, the committee clerk, “rightly” requested a revote because the earlier executive session and the calendar notice may have overlapped, Chairman Lynn said. The revote covered House Bill 98, on professional limited liability company assistant managers, and House Bill 164, concerning local records and an updated fiscal note.

Representative Turf moved “OTP” (ought to pass) on House Bill 98; Representative Perez seconded. Chairman Lynn then asked the clerk to call the roll. The clerk recorded a unanimous vote of 16 yeas and 0 nays on the motion to recommend passage of HB 98.

For House Bill 164, Representative Alexander moved that the bill “ought to pass” and offered amendment 2025-0087h to update the bill’s fiscal note at the request of the Secretary of State’s office. Representative Turr seconded. The committee voted to adopt the amendment by a unanimous show of hands, and then approved the bill as amended on a roll call vote of 17 yeas, 0 nays.

Both bills were placed on the next calendars as appropriate. Chairman Lynn directed bill authors to submit updated reports including amendment language so staff can prepare calendars and floor documents.

The clerk’s request to revote was presented as a technical fix to ensure the committee complied with notice requirements; no debate about the bills’ substance occurred during the do-over beyond confirming the presence of the amendment language for HB 164.

The committee did not record any minority reports for these items at the time of the session; authors were asked to deliver committee reports to the chair by the end of the day.

Votes at a glance: HB 98 (OTP) — 16 yeas, 0 nays; HB 164 (amendment 2025-0087h adopted by show of hands; OTP as amended) — 17 yeas, 0 nays.

Chairman Lynn said the revotes were prompted solely to ensure procedural correctness and completeness of committee records.