Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Clg topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State Historic Preservation Office urges San Luis to seek CLG status; commission votes to form ad hoc committee
Summary
A State Historic Preservation Office planner outlined Certified Local Government benefits, grant opportunities and local strategies for downtown heritage; the commission voted to create an ad hoc committee to explore a local historic preservation program.
Ariana Urban, city planner and local government coordinator with the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office, briefed the San Luis Economic Development Commission on heritage preservation tools and the Certified Local Government (CLG) program and said certification unlocks planning support and grant funding for preservation planning.
"I get really excited about this. I think I had the best job in Arizona," Urban said, describing technical assistance, training and a federal pass‑through funding obligation that typically provides roughly $100,000 per year statewide to CLGs in the form of planning grants. Urban explained that CLG certification requires a local code amendment establishing a historic preservation commission or equivalent, a basic inventory or register of local resources and public participation mechanisms.
Urban noted grant limits and match rules: the state SHPO typically issues preservation planning grants in the approximate range of $20,000 each and requires a 40% match, which can be in the form of staff time or volunteer contributions. She also described the National Register of Historic Places process and federal rehabilitation tax incentives — noting the federal rehabilitation tax credit can amount to about 20% of qualifying rehabilitation costs over a multi‑year period for eligible properties.
Commission staff and members discussed next steps. Armando, director of the Economic Development Department, recommended creating an ad hoc committee composed of commissioners and interested community members to explore how a preservation program could serve economic development goals and how to align local policy and incentives. After a motion and second, the commission voted to create the ad hoc committee and to schedule a follow‑up meeting to solicit interested members and define the committee’s parameters. The motion carried by voice vote; individual roll‑call votes were not recorded in the transcript.
Commissioners praised the presentation and suggested local oral histories and a San Luis Historical Society as potential supports for preservation work. Urban offered the SHPO's technical assistance and encouraged the commission to consider a local register and small‑scale planning grants to seed façade and context documentation projects.
