Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tenant Organizer Background Checks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee weighs background‑check requirement for nonresident tenant organizers; cap added and bill tabled

2170348 · January 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate File 222 would require background checks for nonresident tenant organizers who enter multifamily housing units; the committee adopted an oral amendment capping landlord reimbursement at $50 but ultimately laid the bill on the table after extended debate on tenant organizing and safety.

Senate File 222, a proposal to require background checks for nonresident tenant organizers who enter multifamily residential buildings, drew sharp debate in the Senate Committee on Housing and Homelessness Prevention. The committee adopted an oral amendment capping landlords' charge for conducting a background check at $50, but later laid the amended bill on the table for additional work.

Sponsor supporters said the bill seeks to protect tenants and building occupants by requiring a criminal history check for organizers who are not residents of the property. The sponsor described the measure as a balance between tenant safety and tenants' right to organize; he said organizers often enter common areas and interact with many households and that building managers are responsible for the safety of all residents.

Senator Pah offered an oral amendment to limit the landlord charge to "a maximum of $50" to reduce potential cost barriers; the committee adopted that oral amendment by voice vote. The language ultimately inserted reads that the landlord may charge an amount equal to actual cost up to a maximum of $50 for conducting the criminal history background check.

Tenant advocates and civil‑liberties groups opposed the bill's targeted requirement for tenant organizers, saying existing case law and state statutes already protect tenant rights and that the provision would chill organizing. Michael Dahl of Home Line said tenants already have rights to invite guests and that the Minnesota Supreme Court recognizes a tenant's right to give guests a license to visit. Equity‑in‑Place coalition organizer Juan Luis Rivera told the committee the proposal would "hamper organizers due to the financial implications" and could impose unfair barriers for renters trying to organize in multifamily housing.

Supporters responded that the bill does not bar organizers and that organizers are already required under the current law to be accompanied by a resident when entering nonresident buildings; the chair's counsel confirmed the existing statutory provision (Minn. Stat. § 504B.0.212, subd. 1(e)) requires a nonresident tenant organizer to be accompanied by a resident while in the residential building.

Committee members also noted broader housing‑system reasons behind organizer presence, with several senators stressing underlying shortages of affordable housing and arguing that enforcement capacity and shelter availability are part of why people occupy units without authorization.

Procedural actions recorded in the hearing: an oral amendment capping the landlord's charge at $50 was adopted; the committee later voted to lay Senate File 222, as amended, on the table. No roll‑call tallies for the final tabling vote were recorded in the transcript; the committee announced the bill had been laid on the table.