Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Construction Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee raises concept to increase school construction reimbursement for municipalities meeting affordable-housing thresholds
Summary
The committee agreed to hear a concept tying higher reimbursement percentages for school construction grants to municipalities that meet certain affordable housing thresholds; several members warned the proposal could penalize communities that lack infrastructure or realistic capacity to meet the target.
The Housing Committee raised a concept to increase the reimbursement percentage for school building project grants for municipalities that meet specified affordable housing thresholds.
Representative Scott summarized the proposal as a “carrot” that would boost funding for towns that meet the likely 10% threshold under Conn. Gen. Stat. §8-30g. He said it would “allow municipalities who have met the threshold…to get some increased funding” for school construction.
Several members strongly opposed conditioning school construction aid on a housing-stock threshold. Senator Sampson said tying school construction funding to a housing metric is “a really dangerous precedent,” arguing that many alliance districts and smaller towns may never reach a 10% affordable-housing threshold because of geography, infrastructure limits, or other constraints. Representative Weir said parts of eastern Connecticut lack public sewer, water, suitable topography and transit, and cautioned the policy would effectively penalize towns for factors beyond local zoning choices.
Committee members emphasized that the vote taken at the meeting was to raise the concept for a hearing and not final approval of any statutory language. Representatives asked whether the bill would be referred to bonding or education committees given its link to school construction; the chair said it might be referred to the bonding committee.
The committee conducted a roll-call vote to place the concept on the committee calendar for public hearing.
Members requested more detail at the hearing about the exact threshold, how “affordable housing” is defined in statute, program referrals and whether the change would affect alliance districts or towns with limited infrastructure. Representative Gonzales asked the sponsor to confirm the definition; the sponsor cited “8-30g” (deed-restricted or subsidized housing) in response.
