Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Policy Committee Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Energy and Technology Committee raises multiple energy concepts, refers seven bills to other committees
Summary
The committee voted to draft Senate Bill 647 as a committee bill, referred seven bills to other committees, and agreed to raise eight policy concepts for public hearing, keeping roll-call votes open until 4 p.m. for members not present.
Get email alerts on the Energy Policy Committee Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hartford — The Connecticut General Assembly’s Energy and Technology Committee on an expedited agenda voted to draft Senate Bill 647 as a committee bill, refer seven introduced bills to other committees of cognizance and to raise eight policy concepts for public hearing, the panel’s cochairs said at the start of the session.
The actions clear several items for public hearings and further vetting. The committee’s cochair, State Representative Jonathan Steinberg, said the meeting would move quickly and that drafting SB 647 as a committee bill would let the panel hold a focused public hearing on “protections from consumer access to affordable electricity,” the subject as stated in the agenda. The motion to draft SB 647 as a committee bill was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote; committee leadership said votes would remain open until 4 p.m. for absent members.
Why it matters: referral and concept votes send proposals to committees that have the subject-matter expertise to vet legal, fiscal and technical issues before any bill is reported out. Committee cochairs framed the meeting as a way to gather information and publicly vet ideas that could affect ratepayers, workforce training, renewable energy siting and utility regulation.
Most of the referred bills were routed to committees that handle related policy matters: House Bill 6298 (testimony to the signing council) to Government Administration and Elections; a decommissioning requirement for solar-voltaic systems to Environment; House Bill 5677 (solar installations and common interest communities) to Planning and Development; House Bill 6304 (training and certification for solar-panel installation workers) to General Law; tax-related elements for solar projects starting in Finance; House Bill 5403 (prohibiting state agencies and municipalities from purchasing or operating certain unmanned aircraft systems) to Finance; and Senate Bill 899 (implementing a uniform solar capacity tax) starting in General Law with anticipated interest from Finance.
The committee also agreed to raise, for public hearing, eight concepts including: establishing a Connecticut Home Energy Label and a training program for energy-efficiency professionals; funding for the Residential Energy Preparation Services Program; community choice aggregation; grants for qualified renewable diesel producers; pilot funding for thermal energy networks; notice-of-excavation requirements by public utilities to property owners; broad discussions concerning electric utilities; and a technical revisions bill from the Legislative Commissioner.
Votes at a glance: - Senate Bill 647 — motion to draft as a committee bill: approved by voice vote; votes to remain open until 4 p.m. for absent members. - Referral of House Bills 6298, 50401 (decommissioning solar), 5677, 6304, 5403 and Senate Bill 899 to other committees: approved by voice vote; votes to remain open until 4 p.m. - Concepts to be raised (Item 5): Connecticut Home Energy Label (roll-call vote; item advanced), Residential Energy Preparation Services funding (roll-call vote; item advanced), Electric utilities (roll-call vote; item advanced). Other concepts (community choice aggregation, renewable diesel grants, thermal energy networks pilot grants, notice of excavation, legislative technical revisions) were advanced by voice vote.
Committee leaders repeatedly emphasized that raising a concept does not indicate support for any final bill text and that routing to the appropriate committee is intended to enable subject-matter vetting. The cochairs also said some items might return to the Energy and Technology Committee after initial review elsewhere.
The committee recessed after completing the agenda and set its next meeting for Tuesday, Feb. 4; clerks and chairs noted roll-call tallies would be kept open to 4 p.m. for members who were not present during votes.
Ending: The committee’s actions clear multiple items for public hearings and further intercommittee review; specific bill language and fiscal impact information will be considered in future hearings.

