Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement And Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reopens debate on reinstating nuisance abatement board; continues discussion to March meeting
Summary
Commissioners debated whether to reconstitute a nuisance abatement board used previously to close establishments tied to criminal activity; city attorney and staff outlined existing legal tools and recommended further review. The committee continued the item to March 12 so the sponsor can draft updated language and consult other jurisdictions.
The committee discussed reestablishing a nuisance abatement board that the city disbanded in 2003. Vice Mayor Bhatt (sponsoring the continuation) and Commissioner Bock, who raised the item, led a multi-commissioner discussion about whether the board would add an efficient tool to address repeat criminal activity at commercial premises.
Rob Rosenwald and the city attorney’s office explained that the prior board was disbanded because other legal avenues — injunctive relief, civil forfeiture, license suspension and existing code enforcement processes — were available and had been used successfully in recent cases. City legal staff said if the commission wishes, the board could be reconstituted on its prior statutory terms, but they did not take a position that reconstituting the board was required.
Commissioners who supported testing the board said it merely adds an additional enforcement tool; others cautioned about the administrative cost and asked whether resident-appointed panels adjudicating criminal nuisance claims are productive. Commissioner Bock said her goal is to pursue tools that can address long-term problem establishments and asked staff to study other cities’ experiences, including Fort Lauderdale.
The committee agreed to continue the item to the March 12 meeting. Vice Mayor Bhatt said she will consult with Fort Lauderdale staff and prepare draft legislation showing how a modern nuisance-abatement board might be structured, including the scope of offenses and procedural safeguards noted in the previous ordinance. The city attorney noted Florida statutes cited in the old ordinance and advised staff will confirm what criminal conduct the state statute covers and whether the municipal ordinance can be adjusted within that framework.
