Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City staff present interactive 2025–26 Capital Improvement Plan to Planning Commission; input due Feb. 28

2167710 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City budget staff presented the public‑facing Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2025–26 as an interactive PDF with one‑page project summaries. Commissioners were shown how to score projects; staff requested completed scores by Friday, Feb. 28, and provided contact information for assistance.

Jonathan Baker, budget analyst in the Office of Management and Budget, presented the City of Saginaw’s draft 2025–26 Capital Improvement Plan to the Planning Commission. Baker said the CIP has been converted from a spreadsheet to an interactive PDF with one‑page summaries for each project and drop‑down scoring to help commissioners evaluate and rank projects.

Why it matters: The CIP compiles proposed capital projects over $20,000 that affect the public realm. Commissioners’ scores and comments feed into the manager’s prioritization and the budget process; staff set a return deadline for commission scoring of Friday, Feb. 28.

Presentation details and logistics: Baker demonstrated the document, explained scoring categories (imperative, essential, important, desirable) and said each project page lists funding sources, years and short descriptions. He advised commissioners to download the PDF before using the dropdown scoring, provided his office phone (989‑759‑1519) and email (jbaker@saginaw‑mi.com) for help, and confirmed the CIP includes recurring utility and street programs (water main, sewer main, lead line replacement) that must be listed annually.

Questions from commissioners focused on accessibility of the interactive file, the project list (which projects are already in active construction or design phases) and how to return completed scoring. Staff said some projects are in multi‑year phases (design then construction) and that completed scoring should be returned to staff via email if commissioners prefer.