Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Statutory Drafting Notice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judiciary committee reopens and amends HB 1405 to remove website text and shorten notice period to 30 days
Summary
The committee reconsidered and further amended House Bill 1405 to remove a website URL from century-code language, replace it with a reference to the North Dakota Supreme Court website, and to shorten a notice period from 60 to 30 days; the committee later recommended do pass as amended, 9-5.
Get email alerts on the Statutory Drafting Notice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BISMARCK, N.D. ' The House Judiciary Committee reopened House Bill 1405 to address drafting guidance from legislative counsel and adopted multiple amendments clarifying how a court summons must reference the North Dakota Supreme Court self-help resource and shortening a statutory notice period from 60 to 30 days.
Sponsor and committee members reported that legislative counsel advised against embedding a raw website address (www.ndcourts.gov) in the century code. The committee first considered replacing the explicit URL with the phrase "the North Dakota Supreme Court" and later refined that to read "the website of the North Dakota Supreme Court" or "the North Dakota Supreme Court self-help website," language committee members accepted to comply with drafting rules.
The committee also revisited an amendment that had altered a statutory period from 60 to 30 days. Representative Wolf moved to change the 60-day reference back to 30 days; the motion passed on a roll call. Members debated the specific phrasing and order of amendments several times; votes to reconsider and to amend carried overwhelmingly at multiple points of the hearing. Committee discussion referenced legislative-counsel constraints and the permanency of code text.
After motions, reconsideration and further amendments, Representative Van Winkle moved a do-pass-as-amended recommendation. The final roll call produced a committee recommendation of do pass as amended with a recorded vote of 9 in favor and 5 opposed. The committee signed the amended bill for further consideration.
The bill's changes are technical and editorial in nature (removing an explicit URL and adjusting the notice period) and the hearing record shows the committee worked to ensure the statutory text complied with legislative-counsel rules for code drafting.
