Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Sales Tax Caps topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House panel advances bill to cap Home Rule local sales taxes; passes 12-1
Summary
The House Finance and Taxation Committee gave a recommended "do pass" on House Bill 1552, which would cap Home Rule local sales taxes. The committee heard tax-department explanation of how local taxes stack with the 5% state rate and voted 12-1 with one member absent to forward the bill.
House Finance and Taxation Committee Chairman Hedlund brought House Bill 1552 back for committee consideration and Representative Doctor moved a recommended "do pass" on the bill.
Representative Doctor moved the recommendation, saying supporters view the bill as a way to "firm things up" if the Legislature adopts caps on other local taxes: "this would sure firm things up if that's our intention to have caps on political subs and so that's why I'm supporting this bill." Representative Vista seconded the motion and the committee opened for discussion.
Shannon of the tax department explained how local sales taxes are layered on top of the state rate: "the state rate is 5% and then the county tax stacks on top. And if there's a city that stacks on top too." She added that county local rates range from "a quarter percent to 1%" and said nine cities currently have a 3% local rate. She offered a staff perspective on why some small towns reach local maximums: "my personal opinion is it has to do with online sales... sales tax is destination sourced. So where the customer receives the goods is where the tax applies. So when you're talking about online retailers delivering to these small towns, those sales are being taxed at that local rate." Representative Porter said he supported the bill but reiterated concerns about cumulative local rates in some places where city and county taxes could add to high combined local levies.
Representative Dressler said he was coming to terms with the mechanics of sales tax and noted the tax's role relative to property-tax relief, saying he would "probably support" the bill.
The clerk then read the roll call for a recommended "do pass" on House Bill 1552. The recorded votes were: Chairman Hedlund — Yes; Vice Chairman Hager — Yes; Representative Anderson — Yes; Representative Doctor — Yes; Representative Dressler — Yes; Representative Greenheck — Yes; Representative Machtenbacher — Yes; Representative Nehring — Yes; Representative Olson — Yes; Representative Porter — Yes; Representative Steiner — No; Representative Toman — Yes; Representative Foss — Yes; Representative Vista — Yes. The committee recorded the motion as carried, 12 to 1 with one member absent and not voting. Representative Nehring was asked to carry the bill to the floor.
The committee discussion included staff detail that the bill would apply to cities (Home Rule local sales taxes) and not to county-only levies. Supporters described the measure as creating a clear cap for city sales taxes if the Legislature proceeds with other reforms; opponents or skeptics raised concerns about cumulative local rates in areas where city and county taxes both apply.
Votes at a glance: House Bill 1552 — Committee recommendation: Do pass; vote 12–1, 1 absent; mover: Representative Doctor; second: Representative Vista.
The committee moved to its next agenda item following the vote.
