Board adopts South Bay and Westside area plans to meet housing deadlines amid community debate

2166471 · January 28, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After public hearings and amendments, the Board of Supervisors approved the South Bay and Westside area plans Jan. 28, 2025. The plans rezone targeted unincorporated parcels to create housing capacity the county says is necessary to comply with state housing element requirements; some residents urged delays or refinements.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Jan. 28 approved two area plans — the South Bay Area Plan and the Westside Area Plan — that revise land‑use designations and zoning in multiple unincorporated communities to accommodate the county’s state‑required housing allocations.

Regional Planning staff described outreach and changes made after public input. The South Bay plan covers eight unincorporated communities and was amended in several neighborhoods to change proposed street classifications and adjust building heights; staff said the plan accommodates roughly 53,100 additional housing units in the planning area. The Westside plan includes updates and a Community Standards District (CSD) intended to establish development form and height limits; supervisors and community groups negotiated language removing some CSD development standards so staff and residents could craft neighborhood‑specific standards informed by further engagement.

Supervisor Holly Mitchell, who represents portions of the Westside plan area, emphasized the need to meet state deadlines and avoid “builder’s remedy” consequences, where noncompliant jurisdictions can lose local control over projects. “If the board chose not to adopt this area plan, we would be out of compliance with our housing element,” Regional Planning Director Amy Vodick said during the hearing, listing state funding programs that become unavailable to noncompliant jurisdictions.

Residents and community associations testified at length about concerns over density, traffic, school capacity and local character. View Park and Ladera Heights representatives asked for additional study, protections for small‑business corridors and safeguards for sensitive neighborhoods. School and district officials warned that developer mitigation fees alone would not address capacity needs for K‑12 facilities and urged closer coordination on infrastructure planning.

After public comment and a pair of late amendments (notably language directing the department to develop CSD development standards for Ladera Heights and View Park that focus on form, not uses or density), the board approved the South Bay plan (vote recorded 4‑0) and the Westside plan (vote recorded 4‑0). The roll calls showed supervisors Solis, Mitchell, Horvath and Hahn voting aye; the chair was not recorded on those particular roll calls.

Regional Planning staff said the departments will continue engagement on community standards and will pursue federal and state grant opportunities to help fund infrastructure improvements tied to the increased housing capacity. Directors also noted that HUD‑ and state‑administered grants can support capital improvements and that the department had initiated outreach with cities that share borders with the unincorporated areas to coordinate land‑use and zoning policy.

Board members and staff said adoption does not mean immediate construction; projects will still require discretionary approvals, environmental review where required and coordination with infrastructure providers. The plans are intended to reconcile state housing law requirements with local policy, and supervisors emphasized the need to pair rezoning with investments in transit, schools, parks and sewer, stormwater and other systems.

"Approving the area plans is a step toward meeting our region’s housing obligations while preserving community character where we can," Supervisor Mitchell said. "But there is more work to do to ensure housing is built alongside the services families need."