Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Conservation asks for Pecony Farm storage/workshop options and a UTV; committee requests itemized retrofit costs

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Conservation recommended retrofitting Pecony Farm outbuildings or buying a prefab shed and asked for a UTV; committee urged lower-cost fixes first and asked for itemized quotes and a prioritized plan.

Conservation presented multiple options for Pecony Farm on Jan. 22, from low-cost storage fixes to more elaborate workshop setups that would support land management, signage work and volunteer coordination.

Trisha said the department seeks a secure place to store tools and a modest workshop to support maintenance and sign fabrication. She provided contractor scenarios ranging from prefabricated sheds on the low end to full building retrofits in the $20,000–$50,000 range; she also noted that a building near the road might need a new roof and that some barns have dirt floors that would require poured concrete to be usable. Trisha said the current land manager coordinates volunteers but that the town-provided buildings at Pecony are in variable condition.

Committee members suggested interim, lower-cost approaches: secure existing doors, rent a storage container, retrofit the building that already houses equipment (which may be closest to usable), or use an existing donated truck with a cab for storage. Members cautioned that full woodworking setups would require significant electrical upgrades and OSHA-compliant disconnects and wiring, which raises costs.

Trisha also proposed a utility terrain vehicle (UTV) at $17,000–$23,000 to transport tools and materials across properties. Members asked about storage and licensing for use on roads versus trailering and encouraged Trisha to provide a detailed estimate for one chosen building and a short-term lower-cost alternative. The committee did not take a funding vote and requested a follow-up with itemized retrofit quotes and clearer scope.