Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Space Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rose Ridge developers report changes, peer-review pending; board continues hearing to Feb. 18
Summary
Developers of the Rose Ridge Open Space and Resource Protection subdivision reported revisions including a larger infiltration basin, elimination of a southeast outfall and coordination with the Conservation Commission; the Planning Board continued the hearing to Feb. 18 pending peer-review responses.
The planning board heard an update Wednesday on the Rose Ridge Open Space and Resource Protection subdivision and continued the matter to Feb. 18 so project team responses to peer-review comments can be reviewed.
A project representative said peer-review comments have been sent back to the design team and that changes since the last submission include increasing the size of one lot after test pits, enlarging an infiltration basin, eliminating a previously planned southeast outfall, removing the need for a 14-foot excavation for piping, and adding a parking area with mailboxes and a possible bus stop. The team also said it has started coordination with the Conservation Commission on open-space ownership and management; the next Conservation Commission hearing is Feb. 6.
Board members raised concerns about stump piles left on cleared lots, the extent of clearing within lots versus open space, public-visibility and enforcement of open-space boundaries, and the risk of dumping into open-space and infiltration areas. The board discussed options including boulder delineation, split-rail fence or permanent monuments to mark boundaries, and whether fencing or other measures should be required for the infiltration basin depending on final depth and slopes.
Stormwater enforcement history: Board members noted the site was cleared without prior stormwater committee review and that the developer subsequently addressed erosion-control requirements after enforcement. Planning staff reminded the applicant that if the board does not grant subdivision approval, the developer may face a restoration requirement from the stormwater committee.
Why it matters: The project proposes conserved open space and changes to drainage design that could affect downstream wetlands and neighboring properties; clear boundary marking and maintenance plans will be necessary to prevent encroachment and illegal dumping.
Next steps: The board continued the hearing to Feb. 18 at 6:45 p.m. for further peer-review responses and plan revisions; staff advised the applicant to return when peer-review responses and revised plans are available.
