Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Lawmakers debate bill to require Legacy Fund divestment from Chinese companies
Summary
Representatives, the state treasurer and investment officials debated House Bill 1330, which would require the State Investment Board to divest Legacy Fund holdings in companies tied to China. Proponents called for greater transparency and moral responsibility; investment staff warned of practical, legal and cost implications of an expansive ban.
Bismarck — The House Industry, Business and Labor Committee held a lengthy hearing on House Bill 1330, which would require the State Investment Board to divest all Legacy Fund holdings in companies ‘‘publicly known to be majority owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of China.’’ Representative Bernie Satrim (District 12) sponsored the bill and framed it as a transparency and national-security issue.
‘‘This bill requires the State Investment Board to divest of all its legacy fund investments in China. It’s long overdue,’’ Satrim told the committee. He cited a list of companies and alleged harms — from intellectual-property theft to ties to state actors — and said North Dakota should not be investing in firms that support activities he described as inimical to U.S. interests.
Supporters repeatedly urged greater transparency in Legacy Fund holdings. Satrim said portions of the fund’s holdings are opaque: ‘‘We have $3,100,000,000 that we really don't know…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
