Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Marketing And Asmi Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Task force grapples with ASMI funding request as industry seeks clearer ROI and broader support
Summary
The task force heard a detailed defense of Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute funding and broad industry calls for clearer metrics; ASMI and members urged data-driven presentations and processor buy-in to justify state support.
Task force members pressed the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute’s case for state matching funds and clearer measurement of marketing results during a lengthy discussion on international and U.S. market strategy.
"Where we are putting our efforts, we are seeing increase in exports," Jeremy Woodrow of ASMI said, noting brand-recognition metrics and export measures the organization tracks. Woodrow said ASMI counts brand recognition in customer markets and tracks export data where it markets, but he acknowledged the challenge of turning marketing activity into a single statewide dollar return. "Is that a direct dollar return to the state that you're asking? That's where we are challenged," he said.
Why this matters: the governor proposed $10 million over three years for ASMI; task force members and industry representatives debated whether that level of public support is justified and how to demonstrate returns amid an industry-wide revenue decline.
Task force members requested clearer, consolidated data on ASMI funding sources and outcomes over time, including industry assessments, federal grants and state appropriations. Representative Edgmon and Senator Vance urged ASMI to supply a multi-year chart tying state and federal and industry funding to changes in ex-vessel value and export volumes. "If you can put all of this into magically into one graph, I think that will help us have the winning argument," Vance said.
Industry members said processors and large buyers provide some marketing support but many smaller processors and direct marketers rely on ASMI’s reach. Jeremy Woodrow said industry assessment payments have averaged about $9.5 million annually in recent years but that contributions fell when ex-vessel values dropped; ASMI’s staff said industry payments were lower in the most recent years as revenues fell.
Members discussed matching models, certification support, and ASMI’s role in expanding U.S. market share that opened after Russia lost access to some markets. "We need to make sure that’s not dominated by one particular company," Woodrow said, urging third-party certification options such as the Responsible Fisheries Management program.
Ending: The task force asked ASMI to provide clearer long-term metrics and to coordinate with processors on concrete examples of how ASMI-driven marketing translated to sales in specific markets. Members signaled they will press for clearer reporting when considering state budget support.
