Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council declines extra funding for Oak Street facades, adopts resolution exempting economic-assistance projects from prevailing wage

2165000 · January 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted to adopt a resolution declaring projects under the city’s Economic Development Business Assistance Plan not subject to prevailing wage, but declined staff’s immediate request to add $350,000 to a façade-improvement project at Bellflower Boulevard and Oak Street and asked staff to return with alternatives.

The Bellflower City Council on Monday approved a city resolution finding that projects funded under the city’s Economic Development Business Assistance Plan are not subject to prevailing wage under the city charter, but declined to increase funding for a designated downtown façade-improvement project at the northwest corner of Bellflower Boulevard and Oak Street.

Staff described a years-long effort to prepare the project: the designated-block program was added to the business assistance plan in July 2022 with $175,000 budgeted; the budget was later increased to $300,000. Plans and specifications went out to bid; prevailing-wage bids returned in September 2024 between about $601,000 and $680,000. After the charter took effect staff solicited a non-prevailing-wage bid that came in at roughly $540,000. Because all bids exceeded the city budget, staff recommended increasing the project allocation by $350,000 to $850,000 total to cover construction, construction management and a contingency.

“Should City Council wish to complete this project staff recommends utilizing unspent current year budget and increasing the fiscal year 24–25 budget by $350,000 which would bring the total funding for the project to $850,000,” the staff report said.

Councilmembers questioned the large increase for work on privately owned storefronts the city does not own and debated alternative approaches such as lower-cost cosmetic work, community volunteer painting, or seeking different grant sources (including possible CDBG mechanisms). After discussion the council voted to adopt Resolution No. 25‑05 — formalizing that projects approved under the Economic Development Business Assistance Plan are not subject to prevailing wage under the city charter — and to postpone or rework the specific Bellflower/Oak façade funding request. The vote on the resolution was recorded in the meeting as approved by the council.