Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public speaker raises concerns about regional law enforcement training center funding and transparency

2164595 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Arnie Dean, identifying himself as County Public Advocate, used his allotted public comment time to urge transparency about a proposed regional law enforcement training center and to request lobbyist-related documents under Chapter 610; he cited several dollar amounts and named individuals the council should investigate publicly.

During the public-comment period, Arnie Dean, who identified himself as County Public Advocate, urged the council to review and publicize information related to a proposed regional law enforcement training center that St. Charles County has joined. Dean said he watched testimony before the St. Louis County Council and plans to testify there to present his concerns about the project’s cost and transparency.

Dean said a $50,000,000 appropriation has been approved by the legislature and described outstanding concerns about coordination and potential duplication of services among municipalities. He told the council there is an outside law firm bill “to the tune of, I believe, $36,000,” and said O’Fallon had sought $38,000,000 in the current fiscal year from members of the contingent. He also requested disclosure under Chapter 610 of a $125,000 Michael Gibbons report and “$125,000 in salary expenses of Tom Dempsey,” saying, “I think it needs to be available to the public.”

Dean also raised unrelated items including compensation for Board of Equalization members and a roughly $52,000–$53,000 fiber network inventory expense he described as wasteful. He concluded his remarks by thanking the council. The statements were made during public comment; the council did not take action on Dean’s requests during the meeting.