Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Assessments Education Results topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District presents assessment highlights: Cornwall students outpace state averages on many exams, staff say
Summary
District staff presented spring state assessment results showing Cornwall students above state averages in many grades and subjects and outlined areas for continued curriculum work; board members requested further subgroup and AP-score detail.
Megan, a district staff member, presented the Cornwall Central School District’s state assessment highlights and curriculum updates to the Board of Education, showing the district’s 3–8 and Regents proficiencies above state averages and identifying areas for targeted improvement.
The district’s 3–8 ELA proficiency was presented at 67% compared with 46% statewide, and 3–8 math at 77% compared with 54% statewide, according to slides Megan said were drawn from the New York State report card and SchoolMeter data. At the high school level, Megan reported strong Regents proficiency rates across several exams: English Language Arts (92% district vs. 79% state), Algebra I (93% vs. 62%), geometry (90% vs. 57%), algebra II (96% vs. 74%) and biology (86% vs. 62%).
The nut graf: staff framed the results as a single data point that guides ongoing instruction, data-team analysis and curriculum adjustments. Megan emphasized that subgroup analysis — special education, students with limited English proficiency, and minority student groups — drives targeted interventions.
In the body of the presentation, Megan reviewed participation and subgroup detail: for grades 3–8 combined, the district had about 1,171 students with an 85% participation rate; proficiency is defined as level 3 or 4 on the 3–8 scale. Megan highlighted county comparisons (Cornwall placed first overall in several grade bands) and explained the changeover in state exams and how new tests (for example, first administrations for algebra 1 and grade‑8 regents in recent years) affect those results. She cited specific strengths (fractions and operational fluency in elementary math; high algebra performance among advanced eighth graders, where 76 of 77 algebra‑taking students scored in the top band) and areas for improvement (multi‑step problems across grades, figurative language in ELA, math measurement at some grades and applying math in earth science).
Board members asked follow-up questions and requested additional data. Eleonora asked for Advanced Placement (AP) score data; Megan agreed to provide AP score summaries. Tiffany and others asked whether the higher opt‑out/refusal numbers in grade 8 math reflected students taking Algebra I instead of the grade‑8 exam; Megan confirmed much of the apparent opt‑out was due to advanced students taking Algebra I. Christian asked for cohort analyses (tracking the same students year to year) to better understand grade‑level dips such as a recurring drop in fifth grade; Megan and board members noted that cohort tracking and subgroup drilling would be part of further analysis.
Ending: The board praised teachers and administrators for the results and asked staff to provide AP and additional subgroup/coursesequence breakdowns at future meetings.
