Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impaired Driving Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sponsor seeks to tighten impaired-driver education and allow out-of-state completion
Summary
Senate Bill 143 would update the impaired driving care management program: require re-enrollment for repeat offenders within five years, allow out-of-state residents to complete approved equivalent programs without preapproval, and permit out-of-state residents arrested here to receive services in their home state under certain conditions.
Sen. Sue Prentice, prime sponsor of Senate Bill 143, told the Judiciary Committee the bill cleans up statutory authority for the impaired driving care management program and strengthens requirements to improve public safety.
The bill’s changes fall into four areas: remove a provision that restricts the program to one-time completion (so repeat offenders within a five-year window would be required to repeat screening/treatment), permit out-of-state residents arrested in New Hampshire to complete approved programs in their home state without preapproval (allowing submission of a completion certificate after the fact), align required program hours across jurisdictions where reasonable, and allow program services provided out of state by providers approved by that other state to satisfy New Hampshire requirements.
Sen. Prentice, a paramedic by background, framed the bill as a public-safety measure, citing motor-vehicle crashes and impairment as leading causes of death for younger age groups. Jenny O’Higgins of DHHS and other department staff supported the amendments as “clean-up” language to enable reciprocity and better screening and evaluation for repeat offenders.
Committee members asked whether the reciprocity provisions would also apply to New Hampshire residents arrested out-of-state; witnesses said the bill is focused on arrests that occur in New Hampshire but added that the statute cleanup will better enable mutual recognition when out-of-state programs meet New Hampshire standards. The committee adjourned the SB 143 hearing with no committee vote recorded.
Ending: No vote was taken; sponsors said the changes are intended to strengthen screening and treatment access, particularly for repeat offenders and nonresidents arrested in-state who wish to complete programs in their home state.
