Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parliamentary Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jordan board’s parliamentarian walks members through Robert’s Rules, stresses chair’s role and decorum
Summary
First Vice President and parliamentarian led a thorough review of Robert’s Rules of Order at the Jan. 28 study session, emphasizing that motions take effect only when the chair states the question, seconding etiquette, how amendments work, and standards for respectful debate.
At the Jan. 28 study session, the Jordan School District Board of Education’s parliamentarian reviewed Robert’s Rules of Order and how the manual’s procedures apply to this seven‑member board.
The parliamentarian reviewed the basic procedural sequence that brings business before an assembly: a member makes a motion, another member seconds it, and the chair then states the question. "Neither the making nor the seconding of a motion places it before the assembly; only the chair can do that by stating the question," the parliamentarian told the board.
He emphasized several practical points for routine board business: before the chair states the question the motion belongs to its maker and can be modified or withdrawn by that maker without broader consent; once the chair states the question the motion becomes the property of the assembly and any change requires approval of the board. He also clarified that seconding a motion does not equal agreement with its substance — it simply allows the motion to be discussed.
The presentation covered amendment practice (germane amendments, preference for inserting/striking words rather than substituting wholesale), the order and categories of motions (main, subsidiary, privileged, incidental), and the proper use of point of order to stop rule violations. The parliamentarian urged members to address the chair during debate ("Madam president…") to keep discussion focused on the measure and to avoid personal attacks; he noted that an appeal to the board is available if the chair’s ruling on a point of order is disputed.
Board members asked detailed procedural questions — for example, how a small board may adapt the manual’s rules, whether members may speak more than twice on a question, and how to handle large, complex agenda items like district‑wide policies. The parliamentarian said small boards have some permitted exceptions but advised members to use the formal structure where it helps keep debate focused and efficient.
The session closed with a reminder that the board may suspend rules by motion when a different process is desired, but that such suspensions should be deliberate and not routine.
