Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Employee Representation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to require periodic recertification of public‑sector unions draws broad opposition at committee hearing
Summary
Sponsors proposed HB 735 to require recertification or new elections when a majority of current employees were not present for the prior certification; unions, public employee groups and the PLRB opposed the measure as unnecessary, administratively burdensome, and disruptive.
The committee heard extensive testimony on HB 735, a bill that would trigger recertification elections for public‑sector bargaining units when a majority of current employees were not part of the original certification vote (or by other mechanisms described in the bill). Sponsors framed the effort as a way to ensure unions continue to represent the current workforce’s preferences; opponents called the measure a burdensome, union‑busting proposal that would create administrative chaos.
What proponents argued: Representative Granger and cosponsors said many public bargaining units were certified decades ago and the current employees never had a chance to choose representation. They proposed recertification, on a trigger tied to workforce turnover or an alternative time‑based schedule, so that employees can choose their representative periodically.
What opponents said: Testimony from union leaders (New Hampshire AFL‑CIO, NEA‑NH, Teamsters and firefighter unions), the Public Employee Labor Relations Board (PLRB), county officials and faith leaders characterized the proposal as unnecessary because decertification and challenge mechanisms already exist under RSA 273‑A and PLRB practice. The PLRB described existing election processes (petition threshold, pre‑election process, mail ballots) and warned that the department would need new staff and systems to implement the bill. County and municipal officials argued the proposal would be an unfunded mandate.
Operational concerns and fiscal notes: The PLRB estimated roughly 678 bargaining units statewide and warned that the bill could immediately implicate a large fraction — potentially hundreds — of existing units for recertification. The Department of Labor confirmed it has no role in public‑sector certification under current law and that shifting responsibilities to the department would require staffing and new processes.
Committee direction: Members asked for data on existing decertification rates and details about administrative burdens. The PLRB agreed to provide historical numbers of certifications, decertifications and surrenders. Several committee members signaled concerns about workload and called for more study rather than immediate statutory change.
