Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Workplace Safety Public Agencies topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears plan to align public-sector safety rules with OSHA’s 1910 standards, department seeks time to implement

2159578 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representatives and labor, industry and county officials debated HB 303, which would direct the Department of Labor to adopt rules at least as effective as OSHA 1910 standards for public employers. The department supports rulemaking but asked for time and raised capacity and funding questions.

Committee members and stakeholders discussed HB 303, a bill directing the Department of Labor to promulgate public‑sector occupational safety standards that are “at least as effective” as federal OSHA’s 1910 rules. The measure would also authorize the department to hire inspectors and require annual review of rules.

Representative Sullivan, sponsor, said New Hampshire lacks complete parity between private OSHA coverage and the state’s public‑sector safety rules, leaving gaps in protections for municipal and state employees. He proposed an “at least as effective” test to allow flexibility where locally used equipment, procedures or historic buildings meet safety outcomes even if they do not match OSHA’s technical specifications.

Testimony and agency responses: - Department of Labor Deputy Commissioner Danielle Albert said the department can administer updated rules but requested up to four years to draft and promulgate them and flagged space and staffing needs to implement new inspection and outreach work. She identified confined‑space, ladders/rigging and flammables as rule sections being reviewed and said the department will continue work on readoption of safety rules regardless of this bill. - County officials and some municipal witnesses opposed the bill as an unfunded mandate that likely would require facility upgrades and additional compliance staff, citing potential tax impacts and complexity for nursing homes, corrections and other county functions. - Safety advocates and worker representatives testified in favor, citing examples of fatal public‑sector incidents and urging a stronger, clearer set of public‑sector standards and better training and consultation for small jurisdictions.

Operational and fiscal points: The Department of Labor’s fiscal estimate anticipates costs for additional inspection staff and real‑estate/office needs. Sponsors proposed the rules would be funded through Department of Labor restricted funds (fees), not the general fund, but local governments raised concerns about retrofitting older facilities and planning capital budgets to meet any new requirements.

What’s next: The committee heard detailed technical and stakeholder testimony and will weigh the department’s need for time and the extent of requested staffing against municipalities’ concerns about unfunded mandates.