Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Two companion bills would clarify where political signs may go; sponsor cites Claremont dispute with attorney general

2159543 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 336 would clarify placement of political advertisements on public rights of way; HB 423 focuses on requiring abutter consent when public property abuts private land. Sponsors said confusion after a Claremont incident and an Attorney General letter prompted the bills; New Hampshire Municipal Association supported HB 336.

Two companion bills on the placement of political signage before the committee would try to resolve long-running confusion about whether and where campaign signs may be placed on public property and rights of way.

Representative Judy Aaron introduced HB 336, saying a dispute in Claremont last year prompted her bill. Aaron described a post-election incident in which signs placed on the town green were removed; the Attorney General’s Office wrote the city saying political signs were forbidden on public property…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans