Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities Construction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Marshall board reviews phased reuse of shipping, maintenance buildings; phased price tag as high as $4.4 million

2159266 · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District administrators presented phased plans to repurpose two existing buildings adjacent to the new intermediate school, outlining a preferred scope of work, costs, and next steps tied to capital fund projections and surplus properties.

District administrators outlined detailed, phased plans on funding and scope to reuse the district's shipping/receiving and maintenance buildings near the new intermediate school, saying the full'scope could cost about $4.4 million while a trimmed "aligned" package would be roughly $2.5 million.

The presentation, given at the Marshall School Board meeting by Mr. Pettit, a central office administrator, laid out five phases: exterior cladding and enclosure (phase 1), interior fit-out, site work and parking, additional interior finish, and an optional staff wellness gym. Pettit told the board the district currently has about $7.1 million in its capital projects account (Fund 4) and that the project could be paid from those resources if the board elects a prudent scope.

The plan matters because the buildings sit on the same campus as the new intermediate school and can provide office space, storage and additional parking; repurposing them could also allow the district to surplus older elementary buildings rather than maintain them.

Pettit described the high-level cost estimates the district received from its architects: phase 1 (structure and exterior cladding) approximately $1.2 million; major site work and the primary parking addition about $850,000; a staff gym roughly $508,000. In the preliminary "Cadillac" package the architects returned, the total came to about $4.4 million; Pettit said a more tightly prioritized set of phases aligned with the district's long-range facility goals would be about $2.5 million.

Pettit cautioned the numbers are preliminary and stated the team will pare features to match the district's budget. "This is the Cadillac version, and there's things here ... which we could trim," Pettit said, adding that the district had unspent contingency funds in its new-school construction budget that could be redirected to the work. He asked the board to expect a formal recommendation at the February meeting that will include: final construction costs, four-year Fund 4 projections, presentations from the architects and construction manager, and a decision on whether to commit to at least phase 1 before site contractors finish their current work.

Board members discussed priorities. Several voiced that exterior enclosure and parking (phases 1 and 3) should be highest priorities; others urged caution so the district preserves capital to respond to future needs such as roofs and HVAC repairs in remaining older buildings. Pettit said he would recommend bringing the architects and construction manager to the February meeting and would present detailed projections of capital expenditures and remaining construction contingencies.

The board did not take a formal vote on any phase at the meeting. Pettit also raised an option to incorporate a two-bay bus barn now, rather than add it later, so the district could surplus the existing transportation property sooner.

Next steps include the February packet and presentations, continued conversations with the architects about trimming scope, and community outreach on surplus property decisions that will accompany the district's recommendations.