Board awards sub-finder contract to EDUStaff and authorizes RFP for debt collection services

2159169 · January 29, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a one-year contract with EDUStaff for substitute teacher-finder services (25% fee) and authorized staff to issue an RFP for debt collection services to attempt to recover roughly $25,000 in outstanding payments tied primarily to Grow Your Own and Pathway-to-Teaching program participants.

The St. Joseph School District Board of Education on Jan. 27 approved two procurement items: a one-year contract with EDUStaff for substitute-teacher placement services and authorization for staff to solicit proposals for debt collection services.

Jenny Powers and procurement staff reviewed five bids for sub-finder services; EDUStaff, the incumbent, was the lowest bidder at a 25% fee. District staff told the board that in the sub-finder market a 1 percentage-point difference can equal roughly $15,000, and that EDUStaff—s bid was approximately $15,000 lower than the second-place bidder and about $45,000 lower than the highest bidder. Based on the review and reference checks, the administration recommended a one-year contract with EDUStaff. The board voted to approve the contract; the motion passed unanimously.

Separately, the board authorized staff to issue a request for proposals for third-party debt collection services. District staff said the district has about $25,000 in outstanding debt, mainly from participants in the Grow Your Own and Pathway to Teaching programs who signed agreements to repay scholarship-like funds if they did not work for the district for a required period. The RFP would allow the district to solicit vendors and return proposed terms and costs to the board for a decision on whether to engage a collector. Trustees discussed contract length and the administration suggested starting with a one-year agreement if a vendor is selected.

Both actions were approved by recorded vote; both motions carried without dissent.