Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Home Access Ramps topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alpha 1 ramp program drew mixed scores; committee flagged limited budget detail and full‑CDBG funding
Summary
The committee reviewed a nonprofit’s Critical Access Ramps application (Alpha 1), noting past awards but asking for budget clarification; several members ranked it lower because the proposal appeared 100% CDBG‑funded with limited cost breakdowns.
Alpha 1’s application for a critical‑access ramps program drew questions about budget detail and the extent of CDBG reliance. Staff said Alpha 1 had received Portland CDBG awards in prior years for similar ramp installations.
Rowan noted that nonprofit applicants must meet procurement and federal requirements that add administrative complexity. Staff called out a possibly double‑counted $600 accounting cost and said the agency should clarify that line if awarded. Committee members said Alpha 1 described four sites but did not provide per‑site cost breakdowns; several reviewers ranked the application lower for limited explanation of how funds would be used.
Phil (committee member) said the application “didn’t feel like it was fleshed out as far as arguing for funding,” and Lawson Condrey and others said that while ramps are valuable to recipients, the program’s overall community reach appeared narrower than other proposals. Staff said follow‑up clarifications would be requested if Alpha 1 is awarded funds.
No formal motion to follow up was recorded for Alpha 1; staff will flag budget items for clarification during grant administration if the project is selected.
