Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Supply topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oviedo discusses water use, consumptive‑use limits and options for delaying new plant construction
Summary
Council reviewed water consumption trends, consumptive‑use permit constraints and rate options. Staff and council members debated conservation measures, irrigation meters, removing the sewer cap and whether to postpone bonding for advanced treatment; no formal decision was made.
Oviedo councilmembers spent extensive time on Jan. 27 discussing the city's water supply, consumptive‑use limits, irrigation practices and proposed utility rate changes, but took no final votes and asked staff for additional analysis.
City staff and council members reviewed recent water‑use data, consumptive‑use permit (CUP) constraints and long‑term supply options. Staff noted the city is close to its CUP allocation and that St. Johns River Water Management District approval for additional higher‑capacity withdrawals is unlikely after 2025. Council and staff discussed a multi‑year plan that includes design and construction of advanced treatment (reverse osmosis) and a new production well, with a referenced earliest construction target in 2027 and multi‑year buildout to follow.
Council examined demand‑management alternatives before committing to new capital investment. Members discussed increasing rates temporarily to reduce usage, encouraging separate irrigation meters, eliminating or adjusting the sewer billing cap for high users, and pursuing conservation measures. Councilmember Ott suggested raising rates for the first two years and pursuing separate irrigation meters to identify and charge irrigation use differently: "If we could raise the rates for the first 2 and then do some of the following and see where we're at... If we could... eliminate the cap on sewer... it would encourage people to use separate irrigation meters," he said.
Staff cautioned on revenue impacts from conservation and the need to balance pricing elasticity with revenue stability: if consumption falls, utility revenues fall correspondingly unless base charges are adjusted. Public‑works staff and the city manager said the city has implemented flushing and optimization measures that have reduced consumption; a staff member reported that St. Johns had praised the city's conservation efforts. Councilmember Butterford and others said the city should not indefinitely delay additional supply projects because kicking the can down the road could increase future costs and risks to service reliability.
No rate ordinance or bond authorization was adopted at the meeting. Council asked staff to return with updated consumption figures (including post‑improvement flushing data), cost models for the advanced treatment and well options, legal analysis on removing or adjusting the sewer cap and the fiscal effect of encouraging separate irrigation meters versus including the treatment cost in base rates.
