Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Temporary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concept review: proposed 20‑unit short‑term housing near OSU medical center draws design feedback
Summary
Architects and the board discussed a conceptual proposal for a 20‑unit temporary housing building near Ohio State University’s medical center. The meeting provided design feedback on massing, material choices, corner treatment and neighborhood outreach; no formal action was required at this conceptual stage.
Designers presented a conceptual plan on Jan. 23 for a new 20‑unit short‑term housing building at 190 King Avenue intended to serve families and patients at the Ohio State University medical center. The submission was a conceptual review only; the board offered design feedback and raised multiple questions about variances, materials and neighborhood engagement.
The applicant’s representative said the project team is preparing a preliminary site compliance submission to identify required variances across city departments and noted the units will provide short‑term lodging rather than permanent residences. As the representative explained, the proposal involves “higher density than the zoning code really looks for, but it is not necessarily higher intensity when it comes to the people staying here. They're not permanent residences.”
Staff flagged that the site’s existing building (constructed 1964) may be classified as potentially contributing and requested a preservation assessment before any demolition. Board members gave detailed feedback on corner expression, the proposed “box” element at the corner, rhythm of dormers and material choices; several members suggested reconsidering some siding materials, consolidation of material palettes, and exploring stone or brick veneers rather than peel-and-stick panels.
Board members also recommended the project team engage neighborhood groups — including the Denison Place Neighborhood Association and the University Area Commission — during design development and reminded the applicant that those groups can provide input but do not have final authority over aesthetics or zoning. The applicant confirmed they will submit for preliminary site compliance and that variances (primarily density) remain under review.
Because the presentation was conceptual, the board took no action and no votes were required. Staff will continue coordinating with the applicant and other city departments to clarify variance needs and the next steps for formal review.
