Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council ordains 'welcoming city' ordinance amid testimony and a close roll call
Summary
After extended debate and public testimony, the council ordained a welcoming city ordinance codifying non‑cooperation with federal immigration enforcement on noncriminal matters; vote 6–1.
Get email alerts on the Immigration Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Medford City Council on Jan. 7 ordained for third reading and final passage a welcoming city ordinance, voting 6–1. Sponsors Councilor Seng and Councilor Lemming framed the measure as codifying the city’s existing practice of limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities for noncriminal matters and protecting residents’ access to city services.
The ordinance was presented as a statement of values and a practical step to ensure immigrants feel safe seeking city services. Sponsors said the draft incorporated edits suggested by the administration and noted outreach to the police chief and other stakeholders; they said the text was revised to reflect legal advice from KP Law.
Public testimony included a mix of views. Supporters — including residents who identified as immigrants and civil‑liberties advocates from the ACLU of Massachusetts — said the ordinance protects families and public safety by encouraging residents to report crimes and access services without fear. Opponents argued the ordinance could risk federal funding and hamper policing; Victor Leo said it conflicted with federal law and could be held unconstitutional.
Councilor Scarpelli said he could not support the ordinance because, in his view, the police chief had not been adequately involved and because the policy could complicate law enforcement. Sponsors and supporters responded that the city had solicited feedback from the chief and the administration and that similar ordinances exist in other Massachusetts cities.
Outcome: The roll call recorded Councilor Callahan—Yes; Vice President Kit Collins—Yes; Councilor Lazaro—Yes; Councilor Lemming—Yes; Councilor Scarpelli—No; Councilor Singh—Yes; President Bares—Yes. The tally was 6 in favor, 1 opposed; the ordinance is ordained for third reading and finalization.
