Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legal Litigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clinton City School Board votes to join diabetes medication price‑fixing class action

2155963 · January 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a resolution to join nationwide litigation over alleged insulin price‑fixing and separately approved a client fee contract; staff said joining carries no direct cost and could recover money tied to higher insurance costs.

The Clinton City School Board on Jan. 13 voted to join a class‑action lawsuit alleging nationwide insulin price‑fixing and then approved a client fee contract with counsel to participate in the litigation.

Board members approved a resolution authorizing Clinton City Schools to be part of the litigation and then voted to enter a contingency fee agreement with the attorney representing the class. Board members were told there is no upfront cost or risk to the district; legal fees would be taken only from any recovery.

Superintendent Kelly (identified in the meeting as the staff presenter) and finance director Scott Ray told the board the district participates in the state’s self‑insured teacher benefits pool and that higher insulin costs have likely increased health insurance premiums. Scott Ray said attorneys representing the proposed class contend that the alleged pricing practices increased insurance costs for insured groups, including public plans.

Board attorney Chris McCarty and outside counsel had discussed the case with district staff, and the district’s counsel conveyed that joining the class requires no payment unless there is a recovery. Scott Ray said the lead lawyers indicated districts could step aside if the state declines to participate; he said many neighboring districts were joining because the issue affects premiums.

Board Chair (unnamed in the transcript) called for a motion to approve the resolution; the motion passed by voice vote. The board then approved the client fee contract with counsel by voice vote.

The board did not specify an estimate of potential recovery for Clinton City Schools; speakers said amounts could range widely and would depend on litigation outcomes. No legal challenge to the board’s authority to join was reported during the meeting.

The board’s approval directs staff to finalize participation steps and execute the contingency fee contract with counsel so the district is included in the class if and when a settlement or judgment is reached.