Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Finance Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mills County commissioners approve minutes and accounts payable, question service billing

2155477 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At their Jan. 27 meeting the Mills County Commissioners Court unanimously approved minutes from three January sessions and the county's accounts payable after staff noted two line-item corrections; commissioners also debated a $512.70 bill from Moore Service Center for a computer repair that staff said remains unresolved.

The Mills County Commissioners Court unanimously approved minutes from its Jan. 2, Jan. 9 and Jan. 13 sessions and approved the county's accounts payable at its meeting on Monday, Jan. 27.

County officials told the court there were two notational corrections on the payables document: a Mills County vehicle registration charge should be recorded as precinct 1 expense for $7.50, and a Texas Association of Counties charge listed under “county judge expense” should instead be recorded as the county treasurer’s continuing education for $200. County staff asked commissioners to note those changes before the vote.

Commissioners discussed several outstanding vendor issues during the bills review. A staff member told the court the last invoice from Moore Service Center — $512.70 for a computer screen repair — has not resolved the problem. “It was to fix the computer screen, and it's not fixed,” the staff member said. Commissioners did not instruct staff to pay that invoice immediately; they approved the accounts payable package as presented.

Commissioners also discussed ongoing equipment repairs, including work on a Mack truck that staff said remains “still tracking down” parts and service. No additional appropriations were made during the meeting.

Votes at the Jan. 27 meeting were unanimous on both the minutes and accounts-payable motions. The court did not set a follow-up date for the Moore Service Center dispute during the session.